Bollywood Fitness Babe Lara Dutta

Keyword : Actress Assets, actress boobs, Actress Breast, Actress Cleavage, Actress Nipples,BOLLYWOOD, Bollywood Hot Actress, Breast growing still, Hot Actress, hot Lara Dutta, Lara Dutta Assets,Lara Dutta BOOB SHOW, Lara Dutta Boobs, Lara Dutta breast, Lara Dutta Cleavage, Lara Dutta Nipples,sexy actress, Sexy Lara Dutta , Actress Breast, Actresses, BOLLYWOOD, Bollywood Affairs, Bollywood Hot, Bollywood Hungama, Bollywood Masala, Bollywood News, Bollywood Sexy News, bollywood Uncensored, Boobs of Actress lara dutta breast, lara dutta bikini

Independent candidate hits out at public sector greed

Tony Devoy, Independent candidate in the Barnsley Central by-election, yesterday gave the civic bosses a blasting for greedy goings-on. Here he is featured on Barnsley Cronicle Online. He and his supporters at least realise that New Labour was a greed culture, made up chiefly with slippery eels and fickle ferrets (the human variety!). The sort Saif Gaddafi got to know!

And here's a nice video on the thoughts of the by-election candidates -

Barnsley Central clobbers the Coalition

The voters of Barnsley Central Central gave the Coalition a drubbing in the polls yesterday. Not so much by the fact that they voted in a neatly turned out ex-soldier, but by the sheer weight of their indolence. The Apathy Party took over and seduced them. Those that did turn out did so for a variety of reasons. Those that actively voted Labour wanted to clobber the government for the perceived cuts. They had conveniently forgotten the election of last year and the previous years of Labour profligacy. Or more accurately, forgot about the consequences.

It used to be said of those in West Riding Yorkshire that they had thick soles and thin uppers. The fact that they voted Labour yesterday is neither here nor there. The real interest is in the opposition to Labour in this constituency. Almost 9,500 people voted against Labour but were split eight ways. Seasoned commentators are saying that the LibDems have lost much because of their participation in the Coalition. Dominic Carmen lost his deposit. But he only lost the battle, not the war. I don't think the LibDems will lose much here. I think the greater losers are the Conservatives. They have a grinning Nigel Farage to contend with. He could do far more harm. This is a good result for him and UKIP. They got a good lead over the Conservative to come in second. If UKIP can sustain by-election success, then they could do to the Tories what the SDP did to Labour in the early Eighties. Defecting MPs, dwindling membership - it's a bigger problem than that for the LibDems.

The LibDem leadership is firm in its resolve. It is also in a no lose situation as the tail wagging the dog. If they do badly as yesterday, they can force the Tories to accept more liberal stuff. If they do well, they can take the credit for taking tough decisions for the betterment of the country. But if the LibDems get more say, it is likely that Tory MPs will mutter in front of their hands and maybe go off for more cosy chats with Farage. UKIP's leadership knows that it needs to unsettle MPs. Forget Rumpy Pumpy and his Eurocrats. It's votes for Westminster that count and UKIP counted 954 more than the Tories! And couldn't just one more have voted Tory to make the 2,000?

UKIP have also won on another front. They have seen off the BNP as a repository for right and centre disenchantment. This was supposed to be the big one for the BNP. No wonder they fancy regional lists. Just getting 5% plus would be OK.

And finally, as they say, a word for Tony Devoy. It's not easy being an independent but he succeeded in saving his deposit. He should not feel dejected. Who knows, if Dan Jarvis trips up, he might get to give Barnsley Central real Labour instead of the fake stuff.

The Result

Dan Jarvis (Lab) 14,724    60.79%
Jane Collins (UKIP) 2,953    12.19%
James Hockney (C) 1,999    8.25%
Enis Dalton (BNP) 1,463     6.04%
Tony Devoy (Ind) 1,266     5.23%
Dominic Carman (LD) 1,012     4.18%
Kevin Riddiough (Eng Dem) 544     2.25%
Howling Laud Hope (Loony) 198     0.82%
Michael Val Davies (Ind) 60     0.25%

Labour Majority 11,771

MBNA in the doghouse again!

The credit card issuer MBNA finds itself yet again on the receiving end of a judge's sharp tongue. Not that such remarks will give them the slightest feeling of shame. Such companies carry on regardless. They have a nice business model based on slick selling backed by precious little customer care. This latest episode is about a man taking them to court or more correctly the outfit that MBNA sold the debt to. (Debts get passed around like a tray of biscuits!). Namely Link Financial. If you google Link Financial you will get a pretty good sense that they are at the bottom of the heap when it comes to debt collecting integrity.

In court Keith Harrison argued that, contrary to the explicit requirements of the Consumer Credit Regulations 1983, the bank had failed to send him the necessary terms and conditions for his card, either when he applied for the card or when it was issued to him by post. MBNA said it would have done so. But the bank could not prove to the court that this had occurred.

"I find that neither with the application pack nor with the card was the claimant sent the MBNA terms and conditions," said the judge. "It is perfectly clear that the legislature regards it as desirable that such documents should be provided. It seems to me that a total failure to supply the required documents will prima facie call for some reaction from the court," he added.

It is amazing that organisations such as MBNA can carry on with such sloppy record keeping. They have a poor view of consumer laws. They think there is very little on the side of the consumer and everything on their side. One wonders what on earth it will take for MBNA to shape up.

The busty substances of Jane Russell remembered

Jane Russell has died at the grand age of 89. Remembered as she was for Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, I have an abiding memory of her as a topic of conversation for Peter Cook and Dudley Moore. If the three of them should meet up in the next world, I wonder if the talk will be about busty substances as it was in this London Palladium sketch of 1965.

(For the bit I mean, it's at the end around 9 minutes in!)



Pete and Dud London Palladium 1965 from DC Morgan on Vimeo.
And here's a different tribute to the lady.

Breast milk ice cream gets boobed by authorities

Ice cream made from breast milk has been removed from a central London restaurant on health grounds following complaints by members of the public. Surely not those who tasted it. The owner of the ice cream parlour says the stuff is very fine indeed. It's pasteurised and excellent. The ice cream was churned with donations from London mother Victoria Hiley, and served with a rusk and an optional shot of Calpol or Bonjela. Each serving costs £14. All very enterprising in a less than enterprising year so far.

Along comes Westminster City Council to scoop the confection off the counters and experiment with it in their laboratories. Tory Westminster Councillor Brian Connell said, "Selling foodstuffs made from another person's bodily fluids can lead to viruses being passed on and, in this case, potentially hepatitis. As the local authority we will support small businesses and applaud innovative ideas wherever possible, but must protect the health of consumers." Pity he's not so hot on hospital filth or catering establishments with rats as inhabitants.

I'd think that "bodily fluids" of another person which had been pasteurised were far more efficacious than some of the so-called food fed to animals. Mad cow disease didn't come from breast milk ice cream! I think this is more about the sensitivities of a couple of Brits unable to see the funny side of this enterprise. If people want to pay £14 for an ice cream delight that's their business. What if the council finds out that this ice cream is 100% virus free and hepatitis negative? Maybe they will go to the Council of Europe for a verdict, from the fallen madonna with the big boobies.

Derby City Council free to discriminate against Christians

The Supreme Court (supremely something!) has ruled that it is not acceptable for traditional Christians to be foster carers. Derby City Council, which took against a traditional Christian couple over their beliefs on homosexual activities, are free to discriminate against those they feel go against the secular teachings of the state. It may well mean that Derby will go after schoolteachers, doctors and any manner of person. We live in an intolerant society because only the views of a few mean a hell of a lot to the likes of Derby City Council.

We should be on our guard. This attack on Christians should not mean that freedom of belief for those perpetrating the attacks should be diminished. Far from it. We just want a level playing field.

Archbishop Cranmer has an excellent take on this.